[PyGreSQL] Improvements and directions for the future
Jeff MacDonald
jam at zoidtechnologies.com
Sun Feb 7 15:39:59 EST 2010
greetings,
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 03:17:00PM -0500, Christopher Hilton wrote:
> > Sounds good, but the classic API als has some low level features which
> > are Postgres specific (large objects, bytea, oid etc.) and/or
> > difficult/impossible to implement based on a pure DB-API2.
> >
>
please don't forget about timestamp/timestamptz, which I use in most of my
projects.
regards,
J
More information about the PyGreSQL
mailing list