[PyGreSQL] Improvements and directions for the future
Christoph Zwerschke
cito at online.de
Sun Feb 7 10:51:42 EST 2010
Am 07.02.2010 15:43 schrieb D'Arcy J.M. Cain:
> Lord of the DB-APIs? :-)
Maybe Dark Lord Sauron is already forging the evil OgresQL API ;-)
> Does one ot the other need to be the focus? One thing that I have
> wanted to do for a while is make the classic interface a pure Python
> wrapper around the DB-API. That way it can be used with any database
> and not just PostgreSQL. If we do that we might want to make the
> classic interface a separate project.
Sounds good, but the classic API als has some low level features which
are Postgres specific (large objects, bytea, oid etc.) and/or
difficult/impossible to implement based on a pure DB-API2.
> I know that I have resisted SVN in the past. I am coming around
> though. If I switch I can run it here. I already have an SVN
> repository for other projects.
That would be great. It will also make the project more attractive for
other developers. Maybe you can also install a Trac instance if you
don't want to host it at SF or Google where they already have trackers.
-- Chris
More information about the PyGreSQL
mailing list