[PyGreSQL] Improvements and directions for the future

Christoph Zwerschke cito at online.de
Sun Feb 7 10:51:42 EST 2010


Am 07.02.2010 15:43 schrieb D'Arcy J.M. Cain:
> Lord of the DB-APIs?  :-)

Maybe Dark Lord Sauron is already forging the evil OgresQL API ;-)

> Does one ot the other need to be the focus?  One thing that I have
> wanted to do for a while is make the classic interface a pure Python
> wrapper around the DB-API.  That way it can be used with any database
> and not just PostgreSQL.  If we do that we might want to make the
> classic interface a separate project.

Sounds good, but the classic API als has some low level features which 
are Postgres specific (large objects, bytea, oid etc.) and/or 
difficult/impossible to implement based on a pure DB-API2.

> I know that I have resisted SVN in the past.  I am coming around
> though.  If I switch I can run it here.  I already have an SVN
> repository for other projects.

That would be great. It will also make the project more attractive for 
other developers. Maybe you can also install a Trac instance if you 
don't want to host it at SF or Google where they already have trackers.

-- Chris


More information about the PyGreSQL mailing list